Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

All Data

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Shelby

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Shelby Adults who Binge Drink

13.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Shelby has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

32.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 32.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 32.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (34.8), Shelby has a value of 32.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(34.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Shelby has a value of 32.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (32.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.8).
Prior Value
(24.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
46.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 46.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 46.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (43.2), Shelby has a value of 46.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(43.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Shelby has a value of 46.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Shelby Inpatient Stays due to Heroin Overdose

Current Value:
3.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.0), Shelby has a value of 3.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(8.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (3.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0).
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Inpatient Stays due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

22.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (20.0), Shelby has a value of 22.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (22.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0).
Prior Value
(16.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Outpatient Visits due to Opioid Overdose (excluding Heroin)

131.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 131.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 80.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 100.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (83.0), Shelby has a value of 131.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(83.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (131.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (93.0).
Prior Value
(93.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Outpatient Visits involving Heroin

Current Value:
16.0
Age-Adjusted Rate per 100,000
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 100.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 59 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (54.0), Shelby has a value of 16.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (16.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (28.0).
Prior Value
(28.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Teens who Binge Drink: High School Students

Current Value:
3.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.8%), Shelby has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Shelby has a value of 3.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (3.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.1%).
Prior Value
(4.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Teens who have Used Methamphetamines

Current Value:
5.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (3.2%), Shelby has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(3.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.1%), Shelby has a value of 5.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (5.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Teens who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

County: Shelby Teens who Use Alcohol

17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (22.3%), Shelby has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(22.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Shelby has a value of 17.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (17.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.9%).
Prior Value
(15.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Teens who Use Marijuana: High School Students

Current Value:
18.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (14.6%), Shelby has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Shelby has a value of 18.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (18.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.8%).
Prior Value
(24.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Shelby Adults with Cancer

6.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Shelby has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
27.0
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 27.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 27.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (21.6), Shelby has a value of 27.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(21.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Shelby has a value of 27.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (27.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3).
Prior Value
(27.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
169.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 169.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 183.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 197.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 169.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (170.4), Shelby has a value of 169.3 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(170.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Shelby has a value of 169.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (169.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (174.1).
Prior Value
(174.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
16.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.8), Shelby has a value of 16.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(14.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Shelby has a value of 16.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (16.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.9).
Prior Value
(16.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
39.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 39.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 55.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 62.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 39.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (47.0), Shelby has a value of 39.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(47.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Shelby has a value of 39.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (39.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (41.2).
Prior Value
(41.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
29.0
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 29.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.5), Shelby has a value of 29.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(19.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Shelby has a value of 29.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (29.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.6).
Prior Value
(29.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Shelby All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby All Cancer Incidence Rate

438.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 438.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 465.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 484.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 438.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (457.7), Shelby has a value of 438.5 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(457.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Shelby has a value of 438.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (438.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (455.4).
Prior Value
(455.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
122.5
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 122.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 118.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 129.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 122.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (122.4), Shelby has a value of 122.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(122.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Shelby has a value of 122.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (122.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (127.3).
Prior Value
(127.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
8.6
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 8.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (7.8), Shelby has a value of 8.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(7.8)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Shelby has a value of 8.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (8.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1).
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
83.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 83.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 83.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Shelby has a value of 83.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Shelby Colon Cancer Screening

63.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 63.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 63.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Shelby has a value of 63.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
73.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 73.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 71.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 70.5%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 73.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Shelby has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
41.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 41.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 41.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (39.2), Shelby has a value of 41.9 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(39.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Shelby has a value of 41.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (41.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.3).
Prior Value
(43.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
54.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 54.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 78.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 54.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (69.7), Shelby has a value of 54.7 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(69.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Shelby has a value of 54.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (54.7) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.5).
Prior Value
(58.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
77.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 77.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 77.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Shelby has a value of 77.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Shelby Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 37.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (45.0%), Shelby has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(45.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Shelby has a value of 37.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (37.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (36.0%).
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
143.0
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 143.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 103.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 143.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (116.1), Shelby has a value of 143.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(116.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Shelby has a value of 143.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (143.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (148.4).
Prior Value
(148.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / County Health Rankings

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Clinical Care Ranking

Current Value:

County: Shelby Clinical Care Ranking

25
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 25 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Shelby Morbidity Ranking

Current Value:

County: Shelby Morbidity Ranking

87
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 87 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Shelby Mortality Ranking

Current Value:

County: Shelby Mortality Ranking

69
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 69 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Shelby Physical Environment Ranking

Current Value:
91
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 91 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Shelby Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Current Value:
83
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 83 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.

County: Shelby

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Shelby Adults 20+ with Diabetes

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.3%).
Prior Value
(11.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
33.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.2.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (31.4), Shelby has a value of 33.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(31.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Shelby has a value of 33.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (33.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.5).
Prior Value
(29.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (26.0%), Shelby has a value of 26.0%.
TN Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Shelby has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
6.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (6.7%), Shelby has a value of 6.4%.
TN Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Shelby has a value of 6.4%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (6.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (5.1%).
Prior Value
(5.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
29.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 29.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 29.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 29.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (26.9%), Shelby has a value of 29.4% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Shelby has a value of 29.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Children with a Disability

Current Value:
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.1%), Shelby has a value of 4.5%.
TN Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Shelby has a value of 4.5%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (6.4%), Shelby has a value of 5.5%.
TN Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Shelby has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Shelby Persons with a Disability

12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.3%), Shelby has a value of 12.7%.
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Shelby has a value of 12.7%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
2.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (4.3%), Shelby has a value of 2.5%.
TN Value
(4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Shelby has a value of 2.5%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (2.9%), Shelby has a value of 2.7%.
TN Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Shelby has a value of 2.7%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (3.1%), Shelby has a value of 2.6%.
TN Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Shelby has a value of 2.6%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.3%), Shelby has a value of 7.1%.
TN Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Shelby has a value of 7.1%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Teens who are Sexually Active

Current Value:
32.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (47.5%), Shelby has a value of 32.2% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(47.5% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (30.0%), Shelby has a value of 32.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (32.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (44.7%).
Prior Value
(44.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby

Health / Food Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Food Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Salmonella Infection Incidence Rate

Current Value:
17.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (16.7), Shelby has a value of 17.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (17.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.3).
Prior Value
(16.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (11.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(11.5)

County: Shelby

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
80.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 80.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 80.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Shelby has a value of 80.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults with Health Insurance

Current Value:
85.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 85.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (86.6%), Shelby has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(86.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.7%), Shelby has a value of 85.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (85.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.1%).
Prior Value
(83.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Adults with Health Insurance (5-year): 19+

Current Value:
83.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 83.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (85.4%), Shelby has a value of 83.2% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.8%), Shelby has a value of 83.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 12.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 12.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Shelby has a value of 12.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:
95.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 95.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 96.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (94.7%), Shelby has a value of 95.7% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(94.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.9%), Shelby has a value of 95.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (95.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (93.0%).
Prior Value
(93.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Children without Health Insurance

Current Value:
4.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 4.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (5.3%), Shelby has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.1%), Shelby has a value of 4.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (4.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Medicare Healthcare Costs

Current Value:

County: Shelby Medicare Healthcare Costs

$9,475
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value ($10,071), Shelby has a value of $9,475.
TN Value
($10,071)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Shelby has a value of $9,475.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby ($9,475) is greater  than the previously measured value ($9,269).
Prior Value
($9,269)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
179
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 179 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 110 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 179 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (176), Shelby has a value of 179 which is higher and better.
TN Value
(176)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (179) is greater and better than the previously measured value (166).
Prior Value
(166)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
87.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 87.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 87.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.1%), Shelby has a value of 87.1% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (87.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.0%).
Prior Value
(87.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Shelby Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
52.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (54.8%), Shelby has a value of 52.9%.
TN Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Shelby has a value of 52.9%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (52.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (51.5%).
Prior Value
(51.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
26.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (23.5%), Shelby has a value of 26.8%.
TN Value
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Shelby has a value of 26.8%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (26.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (24.9%).
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,869.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 2,869.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,890.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,301.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 2,869.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (2,841.0), Shelby has a value of 2,869.0 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(2,841.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Shelby has a value of 2,869.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (2,869.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2,868.0).
Prior Value
(2,868.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
86
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 86 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 89 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 86 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (70), Shelby has a value of 86 which is higher and better.
TN Value
(70)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (86) is less and worse than the previously measured value (88).
Prior Value
(88)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
84.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 84.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (85.9%), Shelby has a value of 84.4% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Shelby has a value of 84.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

91.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 91.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 86.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 91.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (92.3%), Shelby has a value of 91.5% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(92.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Shelby has a value of 91.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
87.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 87.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 87.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (88.9%), Shelby has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Shelby has a value of 87.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 3.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 3.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Shelby has a value of 3.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Shelby has a value of 6.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

81.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 81.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 81.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Shelby has a value of 81.8% which is higher and better.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

52.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 52.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 53.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 73 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (46.2), Shelby has a value of 52.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(46.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Shelby has a value of 52.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (52.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.0).
Prior Value
(50.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

103.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 103.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 137.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 169.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 103.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (120.9), Shelby has a value of 103.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(120.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Shelby has a value of 103.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (103.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (102.8).
Prior Value
(102.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
105.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 105.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 128.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 80 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (83.1), Shelby has a value of 105.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(83.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (105.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (103.2).
Prior Value
(103.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
210.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 210.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 237.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 268.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (212.0), Shelby has a value of 210.4 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(212.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (92.9), Shelby has a value of 210.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(92.9 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (210.4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (207.5).
Prior Value
(207.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.0%), Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Shelby has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Shelby Cholesterol Test History

87.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 87.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 87.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Shelby has a value of 87.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.0%), Shelby has a value of 11.0%.
TN Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Shelby has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
41.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 41.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 41.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Shelby has a value of 41.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Shelby High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
33.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Shelby has a value of 33.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 67.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (65.0%), Shelby has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Shelby has a value of 67.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (67.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
71.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 71.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 71.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 71.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (69.0%), Shelby has a value of 71.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Shelby has a value of 71.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (71.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (71.0%).
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 23.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 23.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (22.0%), Shelby has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Shelby has a value of 23.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (23.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Shelby has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Shelby has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

19.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 19.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 60 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 19.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.5), Shelby has a value of 19.5 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Shelby has a value of 19.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (19.5) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.1).
Prior Value
(18.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
0.2
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 0.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9.
TN Counties
(Jan 13, 2023)
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 0.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (1.2), Shelby has a value of 0.2 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(1.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Shelby has a value of 0.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (0.2) is less and better than the previously measured value (1.0).
Prior Value
(1.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.38
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.38 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.80 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.28.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.38 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (11.69), Shelby has a value of 6.38 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(11.69)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Shelby has a value of 6.38 which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (6.38) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.39).
Prior Value
(7.39)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
53.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 53.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 46.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 53.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (51.0%), Shelby has a value of 53.0% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(51.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Shelby has a value of 53.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (53.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19

Current Value:
58.1%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 58.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 44.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 58.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 52.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 44.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (58.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.1%).
Prior Value
(58.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (8.0%), Shelby has a value of 8.0%.
TN Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Shelby has a value of 8.0%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (8.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
4.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (1.9), Shelby has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.8), Shelby has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (4.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.6).
Prior Value
(4.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

County: Shelby

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:
12.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 12.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 84 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (9.3%), Shelby has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Shelby has a value of 12.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (12.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.6%).
Prior Value
(11.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
2.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 2.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (1.6%), Shelby has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Shelby has a value of 2.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (2.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby Infant Mortality Rate

8.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 8.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (6.9), Shelby has a value of 8.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(6.9)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.7), Shelby has a value of 8.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(5.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (8.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.0).
Prior Value
(10.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Shelby Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Shelby Preterm Births

12.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 12.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.6%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 87 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (11.3%), Shelby has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(11.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (12.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

County: Shelby

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
21.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 21.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 21.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Shelby has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults who had a Major Depressive Episode

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (8.2%), Shelby has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (6.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.6%).
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Adults with Any Mental Illness

Current Value:
15.8%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (19.5%), Shelby has a value of 15.8% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (15.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Adults with Serious Mental Illness

Current Value:
4.4%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (5.9%), Shelby has a value of 4.4% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (4.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.3%).
Prior Value
(4.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
11.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 11.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.7.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 49 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 11.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (17.0), Shelby has a value of 11.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(17.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Shelby has a value of 11.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (11.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.2).
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Shelby Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.0%), Shelby has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Shelby has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

County: Shelby Frequent Mental Distress

16.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (16.3%), Shelby has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Shelby has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (16.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.1%).
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby High School Students Who Attempted Suicide

Current Value:
16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (13.4%), Shelby has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.2%), Shelby has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (16.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.9%).
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
189
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 189 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 58 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 91 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 189 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (188), Shelby has a value of 189 which is higher and better.
TN Value
(188)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (189) is greater and better than the previously measured value (178).
Prior Value
(178)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
17.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 17.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Shelby has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Mortality Data

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Shelby Life Expectancy

72.5
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 72.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 72.5 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (74.1), Shelby has a value of 72.5 which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(74.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Shelby has a value of 72.5 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Teen Fruit Consumption

Current Value:

County: Shelby Teen Fruit Consumption

25.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (20.8%), Shelby has a value of 25.6% which is higher and better.
TN Value
(20.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.2%), Shelby has a value of 25.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(24.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (25.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (29.1%).
Prior Value
(29.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Teen Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
8.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (9.9%), Shelby has a value of 8.4% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.2%), Shelby has a value of 8.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (8.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.2%).
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

35.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 35.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 35.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Shelby has a value of 35.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

33.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 37.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Shelby has a value of 33.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
33.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (37.3%), Shelby has a value of 33.2%.
TN Value
(37.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Shelby has a value of 33.2%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.8%), Shelby has a value of 10.1%.
TN Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Shelby has a value of 10.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
8.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.7%), Shelby has a value of 8.2%.
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Shelby has a value of 8.2%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (7.3%), Shelby has a value of 6.6%.
TN Value
(7.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Shelby has a value of 6.6%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
14.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (14.8%), Shelby has a value of 14.3%.
TN Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Shelby has a value of 14.3%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

27.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 27.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 52.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (37.7), Shelby has a value of 27.9 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(37.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (27.9) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.5).
Prior Value
(37.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (7.0%), Shelby has a value of 7.0%.
TN Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Shelby has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
14.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 14.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 14.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Shelby has a value of 14.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
57.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 57.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 53.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 51.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 57.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (64.8%), Shelby has a value of 57.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(64.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby Dentist Rate

78
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 78 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 32 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 23.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 92 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 78 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (56), Shelby has a value of 78 which is higher and better.
TN Value
(56)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (78) is greater and better than the previously measured value (77).
Prior Value
(77)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Shelby Adults with Arthritis

26.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 26.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 26.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Shelby has a value of 26.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 3.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Shelby has a value of 3.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Current Value:
16.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5.
TN Counties
(2016-2018)
The distribution is based on data from 48 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,416 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (13.2), Shelby has a value of 16.1 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8), Shelby has a value of 16.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (16.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.5).
Prior Value
(15.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (19.0%), Shelby has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Shelby has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0%), Shelby has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Shelby has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

36.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 36.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 36.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (37.0%), Shelby has a value of 36.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(37.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Shelby has a value of 36.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (36.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (34.0%).
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
22.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 22.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.3%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 22.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (22.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.8%).
Prior Value
(23.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: High School Students

26.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (40.3%), Shelby has a value of 26.5% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(40.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (45.3%), Shelby has a value of 26.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(45.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (26.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.2%).
Prior Value
(30.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:
9.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 9.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.6), Shelby has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(10.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.8), Shelby has a value of 9.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (9.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0).
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
33.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 33.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (18.5), Shelby has a value of 33.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(18.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Shelby has a value of 33.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (33.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.6).
Prior Value
(28.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

70.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 70.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 88.9.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 90 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 70.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (72.7), Shelby has a value of 70.6 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(72.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Shelby has a value of 70.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (70.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (55.4).
Prior Value
(55.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

County: Shelby

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Shelby Adults with COPD

7.9%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 7.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Shelby has a value of 7.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
11.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.9%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 11.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Shelby has a value of 11.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

31.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 31.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 60.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (51.3), Shelby has a value of 31.7 which is lower and better.
TN Value
(51.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (31.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.8).
Prior Value
(31.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (6.0%), Shelby has a value of 6.0%.
TN Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Shelby has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (6.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Shelby COPD: Medicare Population

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (13.0%), Shelby has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Shelby has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to HIV

Current Value:
4.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (1.7), Shelby has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4), Shelby has a value of 4.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (4.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.9).
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby Chlamydia Incidence Rate

1,071.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 1,071.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 316.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 429.3.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 1,071.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 295.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 468.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (562.4), Shelby has a value of 1,071.1 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(562.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Shelby has a value of 1,071.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (1,071.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (978.3).
Prior Value
(978.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

561.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 561.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 130.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 216.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 561.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 97.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 199.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (269.1), Shelby has a value of 561.6 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(269.1)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Shelby has a value of 561.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (561.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (483.5).
Prior Value
(483.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby Syphilis Incidence Rate

40.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 40.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.1.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (12.0), Shelby has a value of 40.8 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Shelby has a value of 40.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (40.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (36.1).
Prior Value
(36.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby Syphilis Incidence Rate

32.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 32.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (13.6), Shelby has a value of 32.8 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(13.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Shelby has a value of 32.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (32.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.9).
Prior Value
(26.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Shelby

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Shelby Adults who Smoke

19.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 19.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 19.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Shelby has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Shelby Teens who Smoke Cigarettes: High School Students

Current Value:
3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (4.9%), Shelby has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
TN Value
(4.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Shelby has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (3.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Shelby Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

34.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 34.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (34.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.2%).
Prior Value
(34.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

County: Shelby Teens who are Obese: High School Students

Current Value:
23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (18.3%), Shelby has a value of 23.5% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(18.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.3%), Shelby has a value of 23.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (23.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.2%).
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Teens who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Shelby Teens who are Overweight

18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (15.3%), Shelby has a value of 18.7% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Shelby has a value of 18.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (18.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Teens who are Overweight or Obese

Current Value:
42.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TN Value (33.6%), Shelby has a value of 42.2% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.3%), Shelby has a value of 42.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (42.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (37.4%).
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:
14.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 14.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 14.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (14.2%), Shelby has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Shelby has a value of 14.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (14.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Shelby Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Shelby Insufficient Sleep

36.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 36.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.7%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 36.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (34.4%), Shelby has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Shelby has a value of 36.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (36.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (45.9%).
Prior Value
(45.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Shelby Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.4%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 13.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Shelby has a value of 13.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

21.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 21.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 21.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Shelby has a value of 21.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Shelby

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Community / Civic Engagement

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Voter Turnout: Presidential Election

Current Value:
65.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 65.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.1%.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (69.3%), Shelby has a value of 65.1% which is lower and worse.
TN Value
(69.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (65.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (60.2%).
Prior Value
(60.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (58.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>

County: Shelby

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

County: Shelby Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
28.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Shelby has a value of 28.7 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TN Value (10.0), Shelby has a value of 28.7 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(10.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Shelby has a value of 28.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (28.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.7).
Prior Value
(23.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Shelby Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Shelby Violent Crime Rate

1,560.3
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TN Counties, Shelby has a value of 1,560.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 329.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 435.8.
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
Compared to the TN Value (617.5), Shelby has a value of 1,560.3 which is higher and worse.
TN Value
(617.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Compared to the prior value, Shelby (1,560.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (1,638.1).
Prior Value
(1,638.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Shelby value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.