Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Shelby
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Violent Crime Rate
County: Shelby Violent Crime Rate
1,560.3
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(617.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(1,638.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Average Household Size
County: Shelby Average Household Size
2.60
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Female Population
County: Shelby Female Population
52.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(50.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Foreign Born Persons
County: Shelby Foreign Born Persons
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Households
County: Shelby Households
357,839
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Male Population
County: Shelby Male Population
47.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(49.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
9.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population American Indian and Alaska Native
County: Shelby Population American Indian and Alaska Native
0.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Asian
County: Shelby Population Asian
3.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Black or African American
County: Shelby Population Black or African American
54.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(54.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Hispanic or Latino
County: Shelby Population Hispanic or Latino
7.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
County: Shelby Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Over Age 65
County: Shelby Population Over Age 65
15.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Over Age 65 (Count)
County: Shelby Population Over Age 65 (Count)
131,753
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Two or More Races
County: Shelby Population Two or More Races
1.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Under Age 18
County: Shelby Population Under Age 18
24.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(21.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population Under Age 5
County: Shelby Population Under Age 5
6.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population White
County: Shelby Population White
40.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(78.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
County: Shelby Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
34.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(72.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Total Population
County: Shelby Total Population
910,042
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(916,357)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Veteran Population
County: Shelby Veteran Population
6.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(7.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Community / Domestic Violence & Abuse
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Domestic Violence Incidents per 1,000 Population
County: Shelby Domestic Violence Incidents per 1,000 Population
17.6
Incidents per 1,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(18.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Community / Public Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
County: Shelby Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
18.2%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(23.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Bicyclist Deaths
County: Shelby Bicyclist Deaths
2
Deaths
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Pedestrian Deaths
County: Shelby Pedestrian Deaths
476
Deaths
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(529)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Community / Social Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Children in Single-Parent Households
County: Shelby Children in Single-Parent Households
43.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Linguistic Isolation
County: Shelby Linguistic Isolation
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 64 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Alone (Count)
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Alone (Count)
40,870
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Social Associations
County: Shelby Social Associations
9.3
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(11.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Substantiated Child Abuse Rate
County: Shelby Substantiated Child Abuse Rate
3.4
Cases per 1,000 children
(2023)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(3.6)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(3.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)
County: Shelby
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Households without a Vehicle
County: Shelby Households without a Vehicle
8.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Shelby Mean Travel Time to Work
22.6
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(25.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
County: Shelby Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
29.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(36.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Shelby Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(0.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Shelby Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Shelby Workers who Drive Alone to Work
80.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(78.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Employment
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Employer Establishments
County: Shelby Employer Establishments
19,909
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(19,622)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Shelby Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
60.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(57.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Shelby Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
59.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Size of Labor Force
County: Shelby Size of Labor Force
429,157
Persons
(February 2024)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(427,356)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Total Employment
County: Shelby Total Employment
429,454
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(450,935)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Total Employment Change
County: Shelby Total Employment Change
-4.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(-2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
County: Shelby Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
4.6%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Food Insecurity
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: Shelby Child Food Insecurity Rate
21.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Food Insecurity Rate
County: Shelby Food Insecurity Rate
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Households Receiving SNAP with Children
County: Shelby Households Receiving SNAP with Children
51.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)
County: Shelby Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)
29,459
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: Shelby Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Projected Food Insecurity Rate
County: Shelby Projected Food Insecurity Rate
14.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
County: Shelby Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
2.5%
(2019-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,951 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(64.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Government Assistance
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
County: Shelby Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Housing & Homes
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Homeowner Vacancy Rate
County: Shelby Homeowner Vacancy Rate
0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Homeownership
County: Shelby Homeownership
49.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Housing Units
County: Shelby Housing Units
402,681
Housing units
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(401,393)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Median Household Gross Rent
County: Shelby Median Household Gross Rent
$1,103
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
($1,047)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Median Housing Unit Value
County: Shelby Median Housing Unit Value
$206,100
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
($232,100)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($281,900)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
County: Shelby Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
$568
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
($442)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
County: Shelby Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
$1,585
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
($1,449)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
25.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(26.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Shelby Overcrowded Households
County: Shelby Overcrowded Households
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(1.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(3.3% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
County: Shelby Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
54.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Shelby Severe Housing Problems
County: Shelby Severe Housing Problems
18.7%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Income
Value
Compared to:
54.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(56.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
28.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Income Inequality
County: Shelby Income Inequality
0.513
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(0.476)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Median Household Income
County: Shelby Median Household Income
$59,621
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
($64,035)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Per Capita Income
County: Shelby Per Capita Income
$36,230
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
($36,040)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Economy / Poverty
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby Children Living Below Poverty Level
27.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby Families Living Below Poverty Level
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Households Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby Households Living Below Poverty Level
17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(10.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
County: Shelby People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)
16,599
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
County: Shelby People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
62.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby People Living Below Poverty Level
18.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Shelby Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Shelby Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
30.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(21.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Youth not in School or Working
County: Shelby Youth not in School or Working
3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Child Care Centers
County: Shelby Child Care Centers
9.0
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(9.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Education / Educational Attainment
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Shelby People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
33.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(29.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Shelby People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
89.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(89.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Education / School Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Student-to-Teacher Ratio
County: Shelby Student-to-Teacher Ratio
16.2
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(15.3)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Education / Student Performance K-12
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby High School Graduation
County: Shelby High School Graduation
81.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 91 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(90.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(86.5% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is National Center for Education Statistics
Prior Value
(80.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(90.7%)
County: Shelby Students Proficient in English Language Arts: Grades 3-8
County: Shelby Students Proficient in English Language Arts: Grades 3-8
20.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(35.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Students Proficient in Math: Grades 3-8
County: Shelby Students Proficient in Math: Grades 3-8
14.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(7.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Environmental Health / Air
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Annual Ozone Air Quality
County: Shelby Annual Ozone Air Quality
4
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Annual Particle Pollution
County: Shelby Annual Particle Pollution
2
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air
County: Shelby Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air
112,203
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(104,812)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Access to Exercise Opportunities
County: Shelby Access to Exercise Opportunities
86.2%
(2024)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 94 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(86.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Access to Parks
County: Shelby Access to Parks
0.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(34.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby Food Environment Index
County: Shelby Food Environment Index
7.3
(2024)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 93 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Liquor Store Density
County: Shelby Liquor Store Density
11.2
Stores per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 50 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,477 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(9.4)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Proximity to Highways
County: Shelby Proximity to Highways
0.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
TN Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Shelby
Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Houses Built Prior to 1950
County: Shelby Houses Built Prior to 1950
11.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TN Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby PBT Released
County: Shelby PBT Released
56,097
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(66,373)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby
Environmental Health / Weather & Climate
Value
Compared to:
County: Shelby Daily Dose of UV Irradiance
County: Shelby Daily Dose of UV Irradiance
3,962.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
TN Counties
The distribution is based on data from 95 Tennessee counties.
TN Value
(3,869.0)
The regional value is compared to the Tennessee State value.
Prior Value
(3,777.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Months of Mild Drought or Worse
County: Shelby Months of Mild Drought or Worse
5
Months per year
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Number of Extreme Heat Days
County: Shelby Number of Extreme Heat Days
20
Days
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Number of Extreme Heat Events
County: Shelby Number of Extreme Heat Events
16
Events
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Number of Extreme Precipitation Days
County: Shelby Number of Extreme Precipitation Days
4
Days
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(27)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Shelby Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse
County: Shelby Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse
0
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
